Kidwell Law Office

  • Kidwell Law Office, Professional

  • Kidwell Law Office, Responsible

  • Kidwell Law Office, Trustworthy

  • Kidwell Law Office, Approachable

  • Kidwell Law Office, Dependable

Representative Cases

      • Advance-United Expressways, Inc. v. Wines, 112 B.R. 44 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1990) (successfully represented creditor in having its claim deemed nondischargeable in the debtor’s Florida Ch. 7 bankruptcy case)

      • Opatz v. John G. Kinnard and Co., Inc., 454 N.W.2d 471 (Minn. App. 1990) (prevailed on claim for investor client that brokerage firm whose employee was found liable for common law fraud committed within scope of his apparent authority was jointly liable with its employee for that fraud and for statutory interest, costs and attorneys’ fees recoverable under the state securities fraud statute)
      • Resolution Trust Corporation v. Johnson, 139 B.R. 208 (Bankr. D. Minn. 1992) (succeeded in establishing the validity of a secured creditor’s claim against property of a Ch. 11 debtor)

      • Hedback v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company (In re Mathews), 207 B.R. 631 (Bankr. D. Minn. 1997) (obtained grant of summary judgment in favor of Ch. 7 trustee client on state law fraudulent transfer claims against insurance company of the debtor)

      • Graff v. Qwest Communications Corporation, 33 F. Supp. 2d 1117 (D. Minn. 1999) (Federal District Court case resolving motion to remand case from federal court back to state court and motion to transfer venue of federal case from Minnesota to Colorado)

      • Halverson v. U.S. Dept. of Education et al., 401 B.R. 378 (Bankr. D. Minn. 2009) (successfully represented Ch. 7 debtor in securing determination that student loan debts totaling more than $280,000 were dischargeable in bankruptcy pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(8) of the Bankruptcy Code)

      Brian Kidwell has been conferred Martindale-Hubbell's highest AV Preeminent* peer review rating.

      *AV Preeminent is a certification mark of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc., used in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards and policies. Martindale-Hubbell is the facilitator of a peer review rating process. Ratings reflect the confidential opinions of members of the bar and the judiciary. Martindale-Hubbell ratings fall into two categories: legal ability and general ethical standards. Fewer than 8% of attorneys are conferred Martindale-Hubbell's highest AV Preeminent* peer review rating.

      DISCLAIMER: The legal information provided on this website is general in nature and should not be relied upon as providing legal advice. Legal advice can only be provided after full consideration of all relevant information related to an individual’s particular situation in light of currently applicable law.





      (763) 218-0018